History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis essay answers the following two nontextual matter object question : Critic eachy testify the state that synthetic positivity and favorable constructionism argon like in whatever serious respects . If they ar similar , what argon the consequences of this for psycho arranged science s hereafter as a scientific discipline Conclusions are skeletal base on look into d peerlessHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritically examine the claim that analytical incontrovertibleness and brotherly constructionism are similar in more or less important respectsLogical advantageousness definitionLogical profitableness holds that philosophical remains should purport to the selfsame(prenominal) sort of HYPERLINK http /encyclopedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor robustness as science and that it should provide strict criteria for judging sentences sure , mendacious and intendless (Dictionary .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical positivism made use of emblematical logical system , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and owing(p) importance to the analysis of language of meaning . Philosophers in this age (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded logical empiricism post positivism and post modernismSocial constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the view that the phenomena of the favorable and cultural world and their meanings are created in human social interaction . Taken still , social constructionism can be applied to social research itself . The hail often , though non exclusively , draws on idealist philosophical orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a reassure , consoling , kindred universe (Stove , 1991Simil aritiesThe received view is that logical pos! itivism and social constructionism are anti-thetical . However , because they are similar in some important regards , this received view is not an accurate one - the following three similarities can be cadaverous amidst the two disciplines Firstly , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap disconnect what is know and experienced from scientific knowledge . The inwardness of extra-mental reality is in their eyes not possible .

as well , social constructionism draws a distinction between what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the c ommonly accepted principles of geometry to logic , maths and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is apply with Schlick s afterwards defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to bear step to the fore claims that all meanings of scientific terms are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychology s future as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the nature , functions and phenomena of the human disposition or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is base on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By nature , a scientific discipline develops in stage! s and is influenced by the beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay